Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Potential Google Reader Replacement: Feedly

Google Reader has been essential to my Internet experience for several years now.  Google Reader is an RSS aggregator; I subscribe to a website’s RSS feed, and any updates to the website automatically appear in my Google Reader. Professionally, RSS feeds help me to stay informed about new trends in education and technology, and to keep abreast about new information security concerns. RSS also delivers content of personal interest, such as theology and Alabama Crimson Tide athletics. I follow over 450 blogs and podcasts, which would be impossible to do without the use of an RSS aggregator. I have tried other aggregators in the past, but for me, Google Reader has always been the best, hands-down.

Like many other Reader users, I was stunned by Google’s recent announcement that it will pull the plug on Reader this summer. As one other Reader user put it, “[Google Reader] is how I use the Internet.” We Reader users are now scrambling to find an alternative RSS aggregator. I am looking for a new aggregator based on several criteria: the aggregator has to be free, it has to sync between multiple devices, and articles should be able to be configured to manually mark articles as “read” (as opposed to automatically marking articles as “read” when viewed.) There are several candidates, including Netvibes, Flipboard, NewsBlur, and The Old Reader, but after investigating the major players, the best candidate for my use seems to be Feedly. Feedly is a popular Google Reader alternative. Lifehacker recently asked its readers to submit their favorite Google Reader alternatives, and Feedly won almost 65% of the vote.

Feedly runs as an extension in browsers such as Firefox and Chrome, and also as an iOS or Android app. Currently, Feedly is really just a front end shell for Google Reader; the user logs into Google through Feedly and grants the app minimal permissions. Feedly then accesses the user’s subscriptions through Reader and presents the content in its own interface. Feedly is working on its own backend, and users have been assured that everything will be ready before Reader shuts down.

There are a few things I like about Feedly. First, Feedly offers the option to manually mark articles as “read” rather than articles automatically being marked as “read” when viewed. Because I often keep articles marked “unread” until I can read (or re-read) them later, this is critical for me. Second, Feedly offers several layout options. The default layout is a “magazine” view, but it is easy to change the layout to a list view or a full article view.  Many alternative RSS aggregators seem to only offer a magazine view, but I much prefer a full article view. Third, it is possible to navigate Feedly through hotkeys. It would have been great if Feedly had duplicated Google Reader’s hotkeys—that would seem to have been easy to do since Feedly is a front end for Reader—but it should not take long to master a new set of hotkeys.

While there is much to like about Feedly, there also are a couple of shortcomings. First, Feedly doesn’t seem to offer a search option for articles that have been read. I frequently search my Google Reader archive for articles that I have read in the past. Feedly will search the Internet for RSS feeds about a topic, but if there is a way to search my personal archives, I have not found it. Also, while I have found the Feedly web and iOS apps to be fairly user friendly, the Android app is not quite as good.

Different people use web apps in different ways, and I am sure that one of the other Google Reader alternatives may suit the needs of some better than Feedly, but Feedly seems to be the best Reader replacement for my needs. Given the choice between Google Reader and Feedly, I would still choose Reader, but Feedly will be an acceptable alternative for me when Google turns out the lights on Reader in July.

Feedly

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Funny Homemade Fireworks




This is hilarious! (HT: Dangerously Interesting)



Blogger vs. WordPress (Part 2)

vs

I have used both Blogger and WordPress for a day or two, and I am beginning to get a feel for some of the differences in the two platforms. I think I like Blogger’s admin console better than the WordPress Dashboard; it is a little easier to navigate and manage.

I began by configuring the appearance of the two blogs. Although I read that WordPress offers more flexibility in configuring appearance than does Blogger, I found that I was able to come closer to my ideal look with Blogger. (I realize that WordPress.org offers much greater flexibility than WordPress.com.) I also think that Blogger’s look is cleaner than WordPress’s, especially the Twitter widget/gadget. I finally chose the Greyzed theme for my WordPress blog, and it actually looks more professional than my Blogger blog; it just isn’t what I had in mind. I think that WordPress’s mobile interface is much better than Blogger’s, though. I also think that WordPress’s RSS feed looks better than Blogger’s does. The question is, will more of my blog’s followers (assuming I eventually have some followers) access my blog through RSS and mobile devices, or will more of them actually visit the desktop site? My guess is the former; I plan to do a little research.

My next experiment will be to compare how the two platforms handle media, such as MP3 podcast files and embedded YouTube videos.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Blogger vs. WordPress










Today I begin my new blog. I plan to blog about a variety of subjects, but my focus will be on educational technology.  My first post is an experiment; I am unsure what platform is the best for my blogging needs, so I have set up two blogs: WordPress.com and Blogger. I will mirror each post on the two blogs and play around each platform’s features. I believe I will soon know which one to make my permanent blogging home.

There are plenty of blogging platforms to choose from, including Joomla, WordPress.org, Tumblr, Habari, and Drupal, but I chose WordPress.com and Blogger because I wanted to start with a free platform that I don’t have to host. In time I may find that I have outgrown my chosen free platform, but I can export either blog if that happens.